Kamala's Debate Debut

Prepped, Protected, and Propped Up by a Biased Media

The recent debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris was a textbook example of media bias and manipulation, a spectacle carefully choreographed to validate Harris while undermining Trump. From the very beginning, it was clear that the moderators had one job: act as the fact-checkers for Trump and the cheerleaders for Harris. The bias was so glaring that it’s hard to believe Harris wasn’t given the questions in advance, or perhaps even fed her answers through an earpiece. Considering the history of Democrats pulling such stunts—remember Hillary Clinton’s earpiece and the leaked questions during the 2016 debates?—it wouldn’t be much of a stretch to believe Harris was similarly propped up.

Throughout the entire debate, Harris was shielded by the moderators who seemed to have taken on the role of fact-checkers-in-chief—exclusively aimed at Trump. While they jumped at every opportunity to interrupt Trump, challenge his statements, and paint him as the villain, they gave Harris a free pass to deflect, mislead, and lie without consequence. Time and again, Harris dodged direct questions, opting instead for ad hominem attacks, vague platitudes, or outright fabrications.

Harris’ sudden ability to deliver coherent answers without her usual word salads and mind-bending tangents was a red flag. For someone who is notorious for rambling nonsensically about being "unburdened by what has been" and other meaningless drivel, her polished performance was too good to be true. The idea that she had an inside track—whether through pre-debate questions or an earpiece—is hard to dismiss. Her demeanor was far too controlled for someone who usually crumbles under pressure, resorting to her trademark cackling.

And let’s not forget, the moderators seemed content to allow Harris to slide by without answering real questions, leaving her unchecked as she sidestepped direct queries, using those opportunities to repeat Democrat talking points rather than answer the questions. For instance, when asked about her track record as a prosecutor, she dodged the question entirely, launching into a tirade against Trump while conveniently avoiding any responsibility for her controversial past.

All the while, Trump was forced to fight an uphill battle. The moderators constantly interrupted, grilled, and fact-checked him while Harris was allowed to stand unchallenged. This wasn’t a debate—it was a media-driven ambush designed to prop up a candidate who has consistently struggled to connect with voters. Compared to the abysmally low bar set by Joe Biden, Harris only had to appear coherent to be declared the winner. I mean, let’s face it. Biden’s performance in his debate with Trump with incoherent ramblings and barely concealed confusion, looked more like an audition for the starring role of ‘Weekend at Bernie’s.” It was a gift to Harris. The media’s transparent favoritism was just another chapter in their long history of tilting the scales against Trump.

For Trump, the debate was not helpful. The moderators’ clear bias meant that he couldn’t get his message across without being obstructed, while Harris was given a platform to peddle her lies and distractions. The debate did nothing to sway voters—anyone who’s still undecided at this point likely won’t be moved by a 90-minute exercise in media favoritism. All it did was bolster Harris’ standing in the eyes of a complicit press, who will undoubtedly spend the coming days hailing her as the "victor."

In reality, these debates serve no purpose other than to give the Democrat-controlled media a chance to bash Trump and polish the image of his opponents. They do little to inform the public or offer meaningful discourse on the issues that matter to Americans. Instead, they’re a staged spectacle designed to manipulate public perception.

And what did listening to 90 minutes of Kamala Harris do for me? Well, let’s just say, I’m left with a splitting headache and a touch of nausea—no doubt the side effects of being subjected to her relentless nonsense. If there were any winners in this debate, it certainly wasn’t my sanity.